Breakthrough Institute

Security Establishment Says 'No Thanks' to Indefinite Detention Power

Share

Leon-Panetta2.jpg

The Senate is pushing forward legislation to allow the US military to detain US citizens indefinitely as enemy combatants. But the Department of Defense does not want that power. Neither does the CIA. Nor the Department of Justice. Strange.

Spencer Ackerman reports:

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta opposes the maneuver. So does CIA Director David Petraeus, who usually commands deference from senators in both parties. Pretty much every security official has lined up against the Senate detention provisions, from Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to FBI Director Robert Mueller, who worry that they’ll get in the way of FBI investigations of domestic terrorists. President Obama has promised to veto the bill.


When the security state declines to accept rights-infringing powers offered by the people's Senate, the centuries-old understanding of an adversarial relationship between the power hungry state and the defiant governed is turned on its head.

I am reminded of Frederick Doglass's quote -- one that often inspired me:

“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or both."

I wonder if old Frederick is smiling in his grave right now.




Share


0 COMMENTS:

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use basic HTML tags for style)
Use the <br> tag for line breaks (returns).

 

More Cover for Obama's National Security Approach

Security Establishment Says 'No Thanks' to Indefinite Detention Power

Steal This Meme: Cheney's War on Terror Ended Long Ago Because it Didn't Work

The Emergence of Non-Jeffersonian Democracy in the MENA Region

Biden Gets It on So-called 'Enhanced' Interrogation

Ali Soufan's Book is Out

9/11 Coverage Round-Up: Left and Right get it Wrong: War on Terror is Over

Covering the 9/11 Coverage: John Yoo

Covering the 9/11 Coverage: Melvyn Leffler on Torture

Covering the 9/11 Coverage: The Economist

Covering the 9/11 Coverage: Ross Douthat

What Killed the War on Terror?

The Best Analysis Yet of What Atiya's Death Means

'CT Since 9/11' Cited in Reader's Digest

An Outlier, Not a Trend: The Coordinated Attacks in Iraq

The Security Shuffle

Obama/Brennan CT Strategy Memo Underscores Stalled Debate

Did Torture Work? Congress Doesn't Seem to Know

New York Times Op-ed Cites Breakthrough's "CT Since 9/11" Report

Zawahiri Next on Obama's List

Science of Security to Brief Capitol Hill During This Week's NDAA Debate

There They Go Again: Latest Claims about the Effectiveness of Enhanced Interrogation also Proven False

Q&A, with Audrey Kurth Cronin

Al Qaeda and Counterterrorism After Bin Laden

Humanitarian Intervention in Libya - Considering the Endgame

Friends of 'Science of Security' Report from Libya, Afghanistan

Unqualified, Self-appointed CT Experts Training Local Law Enforcement

Politics Trumps Effectiveness in U.S. Congress

Presenting "CT Since 9/11: Evaluating the Efficacy of Controversial Tactics"

Terrorism studies remains an "unruly" academic field, but for how long?

AQ organizationally stronger but strategically/motivationally anemic?

January 2012

December 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011